Two-deep composite

Roster talent

Who is on the roster now — high-school signees plus portal transfers. HS and portal are separate two-deep ratings and a weight mix, not additive slices of the composite. Starters carry full weight, backups 0.4. Size is a separate board — not talent and not HX.

Ranking

Composite

Two-deep + transfers

Measurables

Size

Height and weight by group

High school vs portal

Separate weighted 247 ratings on the listed two-deep — HS signees vs portal transfers — plus portal weight share. Sourced from roster players (transfer flag) and TWO·DEEP depth weights.

Top HS two-deep

Clemson

92.7

Top portal two-deep

Clemson

88.7

11 transfers

Heaviest portal mix

Louisville

72%

portal weight on two-deep

How the composite is built

The two-deep
Listed TWO·DEEP charts from thetwodeep.com for all 136 FBS programs (2026-09-07). 247 composite, transfers included.
Transfers count
A portal player is talent on this roster, not a hole in last year’s class.
OL is not this board
Line size is a measurable, not an HX term. Open Size for mass. Units below are slices, not the ranking.

Clemson

91.8 composite

HS two-deep

92.7

Portal two-deep

88.7

11 transfers

HS weight 76%Portal weight 24%

Miami

90.2 composite

HS two-deep

92.3

Portal two-deep

86.9

18 transfers

HS weight 61%Portal weight 39%

SMU

88.1 composite

HS two-deep

88.1

Portal two-deep

88.2

26 transfers

HS weight 35%Portal weight 65%

Compare two rosters

Team A

Team B

HS vs portal slices

94.6

HS two-deep

95.3

91.0

Portal two-deep

90.6

31%

Portal weight

21%

93.5

Talent composite

94.3

94.1

Starter talent

94.2

93.8

Offense

93.3

93.2

Defense

95.3

80%

Blue-chip %

84%

Unit slices — not the ranking

99.7

95.0

94.0

Skill

93.5

92.3

92.8

95.9

95.8

89.1

98.9

92.8

93.5

Top of the composite

Weighted 247 of the listed two-deep, transfers included. HS and portal are subset ratings — not additive slices.

All SEC Big Ten ACC Big 12 Independent Group of Five American Sun Belt MAC CUSA Mountain West Pac-12

Ranking by Composite. Offensive line lives on Size — measurables, not this sort.

Rk	Team	Composite	HS	Portal	Mix	Off	Def	Blue	Units
1	Clemson	91.8	92.7	88.711	HS 76%Portal 24%	92.8	90.7	59%	QB 94 · Skill 95 · OL 90 · DL 91 · LB 95 · DB 89
2	Miami	90.2	92.3	86.918	HS 61%Portal 39%	90.2	90.2	56%	QB 83 · Skill 90 · OL 92 · DL 95 · LB 87 · DB 87
3	SMU	88.1	88.1	88.226	HS 35%Portal 65%	89.9	86.3	36%	QB 86 · Skill 89 · OL 92 · DL 84 · LB 86 · DB 88
4	Florida State	87.5	89.1	85.419	HS 56%Portal 44%	88.4	86.6	34%	QB 85 · Skill 92 · OL 85 · DL 87 · LB 87 · DB 86
5	Georgia Tech	87.3	88.6	85.520	HS 58%Portal 42%	86.6	88.2	16%	QB 86 · Skill 87 · OL 87 · DL 88 · LB 86 · DB 90
6	California	87.3	87.8	87.134	HS 28%Portal 72%	86.9	87.7	28%	QB 93 · Skill 86 · OL 86 · DL 88 · LB 89 · DB 86
7	Louisville	87.3	88.2	86.930	HS 28%Portal 72%	87.1	87.4	27%	QB 91 · Skill 88 · OL 86 · DL 86 · LB 91 · DB 87
8	Virginia Tech	87.2	87.8	86.927	HS 38%Portal 62%	88.0	86.4	27%	QB 95 · Skill 88 · OL 87 · DL 87 · LB 87 · DB 86
9	NC State	86.7	87.2	86.119	HS 54%Portal 46%	86.6	86.9	27%	QB 89 · Skill 86 · OL 87 · DL 87 · LB 84 · DB 88
10	Stanford	86.5	87.2	84.112	HS 77%Portal 23%	86.6	86.4	15%	QB 83 · Skill 87 · OL 87 · DL 86 · LB 88 · DB 85
11	Syracuse	86.2	85.6	87.218	HS 61%Portal 39%	85.7	86.7	18%	QB 87 · Skill 85 · OL 86 · DL 87 · LB 85 · DB 87
12	Virginia	85.9	86.3	85.724	HS 42%Portal 58%	86.5	85.4	18%	QB 91 · Skill 86 · OL 86 · DL 84 · LB 85 · DB 86
13	North Carolina	85.8	87.6	85.030	HS 29%Portal 71%	85.9	85.7	23%	QB 86 · Skill 87 · OL 84 · DL 84 · LB 84 · DB 88
14	Pittsburgh	85.7	87.0	83.416	HS 64%Portal 36%	84.7	86.7	7%	QB 89 · Skill 84 · OL 85 · DL 87 · LB 87 · DB 86
15	Boston College	85.5	85.8	85.016	HS 60%Portal 40%	84.7	86.3	9%	QB 84 · Skill 85 · OL 85 · DL 88 · LB 84 · DB 86
16	Duke	85.3	86.3	82.713	HS 71%Portal 29%	84.8	85.8	9%	QB 85 · Skill 85 · OL 85 · DL 87 · LB 87 · DB 84
17	Wake Forest	84.7	85.6	84.227	HS 40%Portal 60%	85.1	84.4	9%	QB 85 · Skill 85 · OL 85 · DL 83 · LB 84 · DB 86