2026 Preseason

Two-deep composite

Roster talent

Who is on the roster now — high-school signees plus portal transfers. Starters carry full weight, backups 0.4. Size (including OL mass) is a separate board. It is not the talent ranking and not an HX term.

Two-deep + transfers

OL mass, not talent

How the composite is built

The two-deep
Listed TWO·DEEP charts where we have them; rating-sorted projection otherwise. 247 composite, transfers included.
Transfers count
A portal player is talent on this roster, not a hole in last year’s class.
OL is not this board
Line size is a measurable, not an HX term. Open Size for mass. Units below are slices, not the ranking.

7

91.7 composite · 11 transfers · 24% portal weight

13

90.2 composite · 18 transfers · 39% portal weight

23

88.4 composite · 26 transfers · 65% portal weight

Compare two rosters

Team A

Team B

93.5

Talent composite

94.3

94.6

HS two-deep

95.3

91.0

Portal two-deep

90.6

31%

Portal weight

21%

94.1

Starter talent

94.2

93.8

Offense

93.3

93.2

Defense

95.3

80%

Blue-chip %

84%

Unit slices — not the ranking

99.7

QB

95.0

94.0

Skill

93.5

92.3

OL

92.8

95.9

DL

95.8

89.1

LB

98.9

92.8

DB

93.5

Top of the composite

Weighted 247 of the listed two-deep, transfers included. HS and portal are subset ratings — not additive slices.

All SEC Big Ten ACC Big 12 Independent Group of Five American Sun Belt MAC CUSA Mountain West Pac-12

Ranking by Composite. Offensive line lives on Size — measurables, not this sort.

Comp 91.7HS 92.7Portal 88.7

HS 76%Portal 24%

Comp 90.2HS 92.3Portal 86.9

HS 61%Portal 39%

Comp 88.4HS 88.1Portal 88.6

HS 35%Portal 65%

Comp 87.9HS 89.0Portal 87.1

HS 41%Portal 59%

Comp 87.6HS 90.0Portal 85.7

HS 44%Portal 56%

Comp 87.4HS 87.1Portal 87.7

HS 48%Portal 52%

Comp 87.3HS 87.8Portal 87.1

HS 28%Portal 72%

Comp 87.2HS 87.9Portal 86.9

HS 38%Portal 62%

Comp 86.9HS 88.7Portal 86.2

HS 27%Portal 73%

Comp 86.7HS 86.2Portal 87.2

HS 53%Portal 47%

Comp 86.3HS 87.2Portal 83.8

HS 74%Portal 26%

Comp 85.9HS 87.2Portal 84.1

HS 60%Portal 40%

Comp 85.9HS 86.5Portal 85.5

HS 39%Portal 61%

14North Carolina

Comp 85.8HS 87.6Portal 85.0

HS 29%Portal 71%

Comp 85.8HS 87.0Portal 83.5

HS 65%Portal 35%

16Boston College

Comp 85.7HS 85.8Portal 85.6

HS 45%Portal 55%

Comp 84.6HS 85.6Portal 84.1

HS 34%Portal 66%

Rk	Team	Composite	HS	Portal	Mix	Off	Def	Blue	Units
1	Clemson	91.7	92.7	88.711		92.7	90.7	59%	QB 94 · Skill 95 · OL 90 · DL 91 · LB 95 · DB 89
2	Miami	90.2	92.3	86.918		90.2	90.2	56%	QB 83 · Skill 90 · OL 92 · DL 95 · LB 87 · DB 87
3	SMU	88.4	88.1	88.626		89.9	86.9	39%	QB 86 · Skill 89 · OL 92 · DL 86 · LB 86 · DB 88
4	Georgia Tech	87.9	89.0	87.126		87.2	88.5	18%	QB 86 · Skill 88 · OL 87 · DL 89 · LB 87 · DB 89
5	Florida State	87.6	90.0	85.720		88.4	86.8	35%	QB 87 · Skill 92 · OL 85 · DL 88 · LB 86 · DB 86
6	NC State	87.4	87.1	87.723		87.2	87.6	36%	QB 89 · Skill 87 · OL 87 · DL 87 · LB 87 · DB 89
7	California	87.3	87.8	87.134		86.9	87.7	28%	QB 93 · Skill 86 · OL 86 · DL 88 · LB 89 · DB 86
8	Virginia Tech	87.2	87.9	86.927		88.0	86.5	27%	QB 95 · Skill 88 · OL 87 · DL 87 · LB 87 · DB 86
9	Louisville	86.9	88.7	86.231		86.2	87.5	23%	QB 91 · Skill 86 · OL 85 · DL 86 · LB 90 · DB 87
10	Syracuse	86.7	86.2	87.223		86.6	86.8	25%	QB 87 · Skill 86 · OL 87 · DL 88 · LB 84 · DB 87
11	Stanford	86.3	87.2	83.812		86.3	86.3	13%	QB 83 · Skill 87 · OL 86 · DL 86 · LB 88 · DB 85
12	Pittsburgh	85.9	87.2	84.119		85.0	86.9	7%	QB 89 · Skill 84 · OL 85 · DL 87 · LB 87 · DB 86
13	Virginia	85.9	86.5	85.526		86.4	85.4	18%	QB 91 · Skill 86 · OL 86 · DL 84 · LB 85 · DB 86
14	North Carolina	85.8	87.6	85.030		85.9	85.7	23%	QB 86 · Skill 87 · OL 84 · DL 84 · LB 84 · DB 88
15	Duke	85.8	87.0	83.515		85.0	86.5	9%	QB 85 · Skill 85 · OL 85 · DL 88 · LB 87 · DB 85
16	Boston College	85.7	85.8	85.626		85.3	86.1	9%	QB 84 · Skill 86 · OL 85 · DL 88 · LB 85 · DB 85
17	Wake Forest	84.6	85.6	84.128		84.9	84.3	9%	QB 85 · Skill 85 · OL 85 · DL 83 · LB 84 · DB 86