Skip to board
HASHMARK

Two-deep composite

Roster talent

Who is on the roster now — high-school signees plus portal transfers. HS and portal are separate two-deep ratings and a weight mix, not additive slices of the composite. Starters carry full weight, backups 0.4. Size is a separate board — not talent and not HX.

Ranking
Composite

Two-deep + transfers

Measurables
Size

Height and weight by group

High school vs portal

Separate weighted 247 ratings on the listed two-deep — HS signees vs portal transfers — plus portal weight share. Sourced from roster players (transfer flag) and TWO·DEEP depth weights.

Top HS two-deep
Memphis
86.7
Top portal two-deep
South Florida
87.0
34 transfers
Heaviest portal mix
North Texas
85%
portal weight on two-deep

How the composite is built

  • The two-deep

    Listed TWO·DEEP charts from thetwodeep.com for all 136 FBS programs (2026-09-07). 247 composite, transfers included.

  • Transfers count

    A portal player is talent on this roster, not a hole in last year’s class.

  • OL is not this board

    Line size is a measurable, not an HX term. Open Size for mass. Units below are slices, not the ranking.

49
South Florida

86.1 composite

HS two-deep
82.3
Portal two-deep
87.0
34 transfers
HS weight 20%Portal weight 80%
58
Tulane

85.6 composite

HS two-deep
85.3
Portal two-deep
86.0
23 transfers
HS weight 51%Portal weight 49%
69
Memphis

84.8 composite

HS two-deep
86.7
Portal two-deep
83.8
30 transfers
HS weight 35%Portal weight 65%

Compare two rosters

Team A
Team B

HS vs portal slices

94.6
HS two-deep
95.3
91.0
Portal two-deep
90.6
31%
Portal weight
21%
93.5
Talent composite
94.3
94.1
Starter talent
94.2
93.8
Offense
93.3
93.2
Defense
95.3
80%
Blue-chip %
84%

Unit slices — not the ranking

99.7
QB
95.0
94.0
Skill
93.5
92.3
OL
92.8
95.9
DL
95.8
89.1
LB
98.9
92.8
DB
93.5

Top of the composite

Weighted 247 of the listed two-deep, transfers included. HS and portal are subset ratings — not additive slices.

AllSECBig TenACCBig 12IndependentGroup of FiveAmericanSun BeltMACCUSAMountain WestPac-12

Ranking by Composite. Offensive line lives on Size — measurables, not this sort.

1South Florida
86.1
Composite 86.1
HS two-deep
82.3
Portal two-deep
87.0
34 transfers
HS weight 20%Portal weight 80%
2Tulane
85.6
Composite 85.6
HS two-deep
85.3
Portal two-deep
86.0
23 transfers
HS weight 51%Portal weight 49%
3Memphis
84.8
Composite 84.8
HS two-deep
86.7
Portal two-deep
83.8
30 transfers
HS weight 35%Portal weight 65%
4Tulsa
84.8
Composite 84.8
HS two-deep
83.6
Portal two-deep
85.6
25 transfers
HS weight 44%Portal weight 56%
5North Texas
84.7
Composite 84.7
HS two-deep
83.1
Portal two-deep
85.0
36 transfers
HS weight 15%Portal weight 85%
6Florida Atlantic
84.6
Composite 84.6
HS two-deep
83.4
Portal two-deep
85.0
34 transfers
HS weight 27%Portal weight 73%
7UTSA
84.3
Composite 84.3
HS two-deep
84.8
Portal two-deep
84.0
27 transfers
HS weight 41%Portal weight 59%
8East Carolina
84.1
Composite 84.1
HS two-deep
83.5
Portal two-deep
84.9
20 transfers
HS weight 53%Portal weight 47%
9Temple
84.0
Composite 84.0
HS two-deep
84.0
Portal two-deep
84.0
30 transfers
HS weight 35%Portal weight 65%
10UAB
83.3
Composite 83.3
HS two-deep
84.0
Portal two-deep
83.0
28 transfers
HS weight 31%Portal weight 69%
11Charlotte
83.3
Composite 83.3
HS two-deep
82.7
Portal two-deep
83.7
24 transfers
HS weight 45%Portal weight 55%
12Rice
83.0
Composite 83.0
HS two-deep
82.2
Portal two-deep
84.2
18 transfers
HS weight 59%Portal weight 41%
13Navy
82.2
Composite 82.2
HS two-deep
82.2
Portal two-deep
—

No portal players on the listed two-deep.

14Army
81.7
Composite 81.7
HS two-deep
81.7
Portal two-deep
82.0
1 transfers
HS weight 97%Portal weight 3%