Skip to board
HASHMARK

Two-deep composite

Roster talent

Who is on the roster now — high-school signees plus portal transfers. HS and portal are separate two-deep ratings and a weight mix, not additive slices of the composite. Starters carry full weight, backups 0.4. Size is a separate board — not talent and not HX.

Ranking
Composite

Two-deep + transfers

Measurables
Size

Height and weight by group

High school vs portal

Separate weighted 247 ratings on the listed two-deep — HS signees vs portal transfers — plus portal weight share. Sourced from roster players (transfer flag) and TWO·DEEP depth weights.

Top HS two-deep
Texas Tech
88.9
Top portal two-deep
BYU
88.0
15 transfers
Heaviest portal mix
Houston
85%
portal weight on two-deep

How the composite is built

  • The two-deep

    Listed TWO·DEEP charts from thetwodeep.com for all 136 FBS programs (2026-09-07). 247 composite, transfers included.

  • Transfers count

    A portal player is talent on this roster, not a hole in last year’s class.

  • OL is not this board

    Line size is a measurable, not an HX term. Open Size for mass. Units below are slices, not the ranking.

36
TCU

87.0 composite

HS two-deep
88.0
Portal two-deep
85.2
15 transfers
HS weight 63%Portal weight 37%
37
Arizona State

86.9 composite

HS two-deep
86.2
Portal two-deep
87.5
23 transfers
HS weight 48%Portal weight 52%
39
BYU

86.7 composite

HS two-deep
86.0
Portal two-deep
88.0
15 transfers
HS weight 66%Portal weight 34%

Compare two rosters

Team A
Team B

HS vs portal slices

94.6
HS two-deep
95.3
91.0
Portal two-deep
90.6
31%
Portal weight
21%
93.5
Talent composite
94.3
94.1
Starter talent
94.2
93.8
Offense
93.3
93.2
Defense
95.3
80%
Blue-chip %
84%

Unit slices — not the ranking

99.7
QB
95.0
94.0
Skill
93.5
92.3
OL
92.8
95.9
DL
95.8
89.1
LB
98.9
92.8
DB
93.5

Top of the composite

Weighted 247 of the listed two-deep, transfers included. HS and portal are subset ratings — not additive slices.

AllSECBig TenACCBig 12IndependentGroup of FiveAmericanSun BeltMACCUSAMountain WestPac-12

Ranking by Composite. Offensive line lives on Size — measurables, not this sort.

1TCU
87.0
Composite 87.0
HS two-deep
88.0
Portal two-deep
85.2
15 transfers
HS weight 63%Portal weight 37%
2Arizona State
86.9
Composite 86.9
HS two-deep
86.2
Portal two-deep
87.5
23 transfers
HS weight 48%Portal weight 52%
3BYU
86.7
Composite 86.7
HS two-deep
86.0
Portal two-deep
88.0
15 transfers
HS weight 66%Portal weight 34%
4Colorado
86.6
Composite 86.6
HS two-deep
86.1
Portal two-deep
87.1
22 transfers
HS weight 50%Portal weight 50%
5Texas Tech
86.3
Composite 86.3
HS two-deep
88.9
Portal two-deep
84.0
23 transfers
HS weight 47%Portal weight 53%
6Kansas State
86.3
Composite 86.3
HS two-deep
87.2
Portal two-deep
85.4
23 transfers
HS weight 49%Portal weight 51%
7Utah
86.2
Composite 86.2
HS two-deep
87.6
Portal two-deep
84.9
22 transfers
HS weight 49%Portal weight 51%
8Baylor
86.0
Composite 86.0
HS two-deep
86.4
Portal two-deep
85.5
22 transfers
HS weight 47%Portal weight 53%
9UCF
85.8
Composite 85.8
HS two-deep
87.8
Portal two-deep
84.7
27 transfers
HS weight 34%Portal weight 66%
10Kansas
85.7
Composite 85.7
HS two-deep
86.1
Portal two-deep
85.5
25 transfers
HS weight 42%Portal weight 58%
11West Virginia
85.5
Composite 85.5
HS two-deep
87.0
Portal two-deep
84.8
29 transfers
HS weight 31%Portal weight 69%
12Houston
85.0
Composite 85.0
HS two-deep
88.4
Portal two-deep
84.5
33 transfers
HS weight 15%Portal weight 85%
13Oklahoma State
84.7
Composite 84.7
HS two-deep
85.0
Portal two-deep
84.6
31 transfers
HS weight 25%Portal weight 75%
14Arizona
84.6
Composite 84.6
HS two-deep
84.7
Portal two-deep
84.6
20 transfers
HS weight 55%Portal weight 45%
15Iowa State
84.2
Composite 84.2
HS two-deep
83.3
Portal two-deep
84.7
26 transfers
HS weight 40%Portal weight 60%
16Cincinnati
83.5
Composite 83.5
HS two-deep
85.6
Portal two-deep
82.1
24 transfers
HS weight 40%Portal weight 60%