Skip to board

Two-deep composite

Roster talent

Who is on the roster now — high-school signees plus portal transfers. HS and portal are separate two-deep ratings and a weight mix, not additive slices of the composite. Starters carry full weight, backups 0.4. Size is a separate board — not talent and not HX.

High school vs portal

Separate weighted 247 ratings on the listed two-deep — HS signees vs portal transfers — plus portal weight share. Sourced from roster players (transfer flag) and TWO·DEEP depth weights.

Top HS two-deep
Ohio State
94.6
Top portal two-deep
Oregon
91.7
13 transfers
Heaviest portal mix
UCLA
91%
portal weight on two-deep

How the composite is built

  • The two-deep

    Listed TWO·DEEP charts from thetwodeep.com for all 136 FBS programs (2026-09-07). 247 composite, transfers included.

  • Transfers count

    A portal player is talent on this roster, not a hole in last year’s class.

  • OL is not this board

    Line size is a measurable, not an HX term. Open Size for mass. Units below are slices, not the ranking.

2
Ohio State

93.5 composite

HS two-deep
94.6
Portal two-deep
91.0
13 transfers
HS weight 69%Portal weight 31%
3
Oregon

93.0 composite

HS two-deep
93.5
Portal two-deep
91.7
13 transfers
HS weight 69%Portal weight 31%
10
Michigan

91.1 composite

HS two-deep
91.8
Portal two-deep
88.3
9 transfers
HS weight 79%Portal weight 21%

Compare two rosters

Team A
Team B

HS vs portal slices

94.6
HS two-deep
95.3
91.0
Portal two-deep
90.6
31%
Portal weight
21%
93.5
Talent composite
94.3
94.1
Starter talent
94.2
93.8
Offense
93.3
93.2
Defense
95.3
80%
Blue-chip %
84%

Unit slices — not the ranking

99.7
QB
95.0
94.0
Skill
93.5
92.3
OL
92.8
95.9
DL
95.8
89.1
LB
98.9
92.8
DB
93.5

Top of the composite

Weighted 247 of the listed two-deep, transfers included. HS and portal are subset ratings — not additive slices.

Ranking by Composite. Offensive line lives on Size — measurables, not this sort.

1Ohio State
93.5
Composite 93.5
HS two-deep
94.6
Portal two-deep
91.0
13 transfers
HS weight 69%Portal weight 31%
2Oregon
93.0
Composite 93.0
HS two-deep
93.5
Portal two-deep
91.7
13 transfers
HS weight 69%Portal weight 31%
3Michigan
91.1
Composite 91.1
HS two-deep
91.8
Portal two-deep
88.3
9 transfers
HS weight 79%Portal weight 21%
4USC
90.4
Composite 90.4
HS two-deep
91.5
Portal two-deep
87.4
12 transfers
HS weight 73%Portal weight 27%
5Penn State
88.6
Composite 88.6
HS two-deep
91.7
Portal two-deep
86.4
26 transfers
HS weight 43%Portal weight 57%
6Washington
88.3
Composite 88.3
HS two-deep
89.6
Portal two-deep
84.9
13 transfers
HS weight 72%Portal weight 28%
7Nebraska
87.9
Composite 87.9
HS two-deep
88.4
Portal two-deep
87.3
17 transfers
HS weight 53%Portal weight 47%
8Wisconsin
87.8
Composite 87.8
HS two-deep
89.0
Portal two-deep
86.9
24 transfers
HS weight 42%Portal weight 58%
9UCLA
87.3
Composite 87.3
HS two-deep
87.9
Portal two-deep
87.2
38 transfers
HS weight 9%Portal weight 91%
10Minnesota
87.1
Composite 87.1
HS two-deep
86.9
Portal two-deep
87.3
17 transfers
HS weight 58%Portal weight 42%
11Purdue
86.7
Composite 86.7
HS two-deep
85.9
Portal two-deep
86.8
37 transfers
HS weight 18%Portal weight 82%
12Indiana
86.6
Composite 86.6
HS two-deep
86.0
Portal two-deep
87.2
18 transfers
HS weight 53%Portal weight 47%
13Maryland
86.5
Composite 86.5
HS two-deep
88.3
Portal two-deep
84.5
20 transfers
HS weight 52%Portal weight 48%
14Rutgers
85.7
Composite 85.7
HS two-deep
86.7
Portal two-deep
84.1
18 transfers
HS weight 62%Portal weight 38%
15Northwestern
85.5
Composite 85.5
HS two-deep
85.6
Portal two-deep
85.3
18 transfers
HS weight 64%Portal weight 36%
16Iowa
85.4
Composite 85.4
HS two-deep
86.1
Portal two-deep
82.9
11 transfers
HS weight 77%Portal weight 23%
17Michigan State
85.3
Composite 85.3
HS two-deep
87.6
Portal two-deep
84.6
32 transfers
HS weight 23%Portal weight 77%
18Illinois
85.0
Composite 85.0
HS two-deep
86.3
Portal two-deep
83.5
20 transfers
HS weight 52%Portal weight 48%