Two-deep composite

Roster talent

Who is on the roster now — high-school signees plus portal transfers. HS and portal are separate two-deep ratings and a weight mix, not additive slices of the composite. Starters carry full weight, backups 0.4. Size is a separate board — not talent and not HX.

Ranking

Composite

Two-deep + transfers

Measurables

Size

Height and weight by group

High school vs portal

Separate weighted 247 ratings on the listed two-deep — HS signees vs portal transfers — plus portal weight share. Sourced from roster players (transfer flag) and TWO·DEEP depth weights.

Top HS two-deep

Memphis

86.7

Top portal two-deep

UNLV

87.6

23 transfers

Heaviest portal mix

Toledo

86%

portal weight on two-deep

How the composite is built

The two-deep
Listed TWO·DEEP charts from thetwodeep.com for all 136 FBS programs (2026-09-07). 247 composite, transfers included.
Transfers count
A portal player is talent on this roster, not a hole in last year’s class.
OL is not this board
Line size is a measurable, not an HX term. Open Size for mass. Units below are slices, not the ranking.

South Florida

86.1 composite

HS two-deep

82.3

Portal two-deep

87.0

34 transfers

HS weight 20%Portal weight 80%

UNLV

85.8 composite

HS two-deep

84.0

Portal two-deep

87.6

23 transfers

HS weight 48%Portal weight 52%

Tulane

85.6 composite

HS two-deep

85.3

Portal two-deep

86.0

23 transfers

HS weight 51%Portal weight 49%

Compare two rosters

Team A

Team B

HS vs portal slices

94.6

HS two-deep

95.3

91.0

Portal two-deep

90.6

31%

Portal weight

21%

93.5

Talent composite

94.3

94.1

Starter talent

94.2

93.8

Offense

93.3

93.2

Defense

95.3

80%

Blue-chip %

84%

Unit slices — not the ranking

99.7

95.0

94.0

Skill

93.5

92.3

92.8

95.9

95.8

89.1

98.9

92.8

93.5

Top of the composite

Weighted 247 of the listed two-deep, transfers included. HS and portal are subset ratings — not additive slices.

All SEC Big Ten ACC Big 12 Independent Group of Five American Sun Belt MAC CUSA Mountain West Pac-12

Ranking by Composite. Offensive line lives on Size — measurables, not this sort.

Rk	Team	Composite	HS	Portal	Mix	Off	Def	Blue	Units
1	South Florida	86.1	82.3	87.034	HS 20%Portal 80%	86.0	86.2	21%	QB 93 · Skill 86 · OL 85 · DL 86 · LB 90 · DB 84
2	UNLV	85.8	84.0	87.623	HS 48%Portal 52%	86.5	85.2	20%	QB 96 · Skill 86 · OL 85 · DL 83 · LB 83 · DB 88
3	Tulane	85.6	85.3	86.023	HS 51%Portal 49%	86.1	85.1	12%	QB 85 · Skill 87 · OL 85 · DL 85 · LB 85 · DB 85
4	Liberty	85.0	84.4	85.236	HS 20%Portal 80%	85.1	85.0	6%	QB 86 · Skill 84 · OL 86 · DL 87 · LB 86 · DB 83
5	Oregon State	85.0	84.8	85.225	HS 39%Portal 61%	84.5	85.6	9%	QB 85 · Skill 86 · OL 83 · DL 86 · LB 88 · DB 85
6	Memphis	84.8	86.7	83.830	HS 35%Portal 65%	85.1	84.6	15%	QB 91 · Skill 87 · OL 82 · DL 87 · LB 84 · DB 83
7	Tulsa	84.8	83.6	85.625	HS 44%Portal 56%	85.6	83.9	9%	QB 83 · Skill 86 · OL 86 · DL 83 · LB 85 · DB 84
8	App State	84.7	83.7	85.034	HS 20%Portal 80%	85.4	84.0	9%	QB 88 · Skill 85 · OL 85 · DL 83 · LB 82 · DB 86
9	Coastal Carolina	84.7	85.7	84.126	HS 40%Portal 60%	84.6	84.8	11%	QB 84 · Skill 87 · OL 83 · DL 86 · LB 83 · DB 84
10	North Texas	84.7	83.1	85.036	HS 15%Portal 85%	85.8	83.5	12%	QB 90 · Skill 84 · OL 87 · DL 83 · LB 85 · DB 83
11	Florida Atlantic	84.6	83.4	85.034	HS 27%Portal 73%	83.6	85.7	6%	QB 86 · Skill 83 · OL 83 · DL 85 · LB 83 · DB 87
12	Washington State	84.6	83.1	85.033	HS 24%Portal 76%	84.2	84.9	18%	QB 83 · Skill 86 · OL 83 · DL 82 · LB 89 · DB 85
13	Florida International	84.5	83.0	85.131	HS 31%Portal 69%	84.7	84.3	11%	QB 91 · Skill 86 · OL 82 · DL 85 · LB 83 · DB 84
14	Georgia State	84.3	85.2	84.134	HS 24%Portal 76%	84.6	84.0	14%	QB 82 · Skill 85 · OL 85 · DL 84 · LB 85 · DB 84
15	UTSA	84.3	84.8	84.027	HS 41%Portal 59%	84.7	84.0	9%	QB 85 · Skill 85 · OL 84 · DL 86 · LB 82 · DB 83
16	San Diego State	84.2	84.6	84.132	HS 25%Portal 75%	84.8	83.6	2%	QB 88 · Skill 86 · OL 83 · DL 83 · LB 85 · DB 83
17	Sam Houston	84.2	82.9	84.929	HS 33%Portal 67%	84.1	84.3	2%	QB 85 · Skill 85 · OL 83 · DL 85 · LB 84 · DB 83
18	East Carolina	84.1	83.5	84.920	HS 53%Portal 47%	84.5	83.8	2%	QB 88 · Skill 85 · OL 83 · DL 83 · LB 84 · DB 84
19	Georgia Southern	84.1	84.1	—	HS only	85.3	82.9	11%	QB 88 · Skill 86 · OL 83 · DL 84 · LB 82 · DB 83
20	Colorado State	84.0	83.0	84.630	HS 36%Portal 64%	84.8	83.3	13%	QB 89 · Skill 86 · OL 83 · DL 83 · LB 82 · DB 84
21	Temple	84.0	84.0	84.030	HS 35%Portal 65%	84.3	83.7	9%	QB 87 · Skill 84 · OL 85 · DL 82 · LB 83 · DB 85
22	Texas State	84.0	83.6	84.228	HS 37%Portal 63%	83.5	84.4	4%	QB 82 · Skill 85 · OL 82 · DL 85 · LB 85 · DB 84
23	Jacksonville State	84.0	83.1	84.626	HS 43%Portal 57%	82.9	85.1	11%	QB 83 · Skill 83 · OL 83 · DL 85 · LB 84 · DB 85
24	Marshall	84.0	82.7	84.631	HS 35%Portal 65%	84.7	83.3	7%	QB 92 · Skill 85 · OL 83 · DL 83 · LB 85 · DB 82
25	Fresno State	83.9	83.4	84.321	HS 47%Portal 53%	84.0	83.8	0%	QB 85 · Skill 84 · OL 83 · DL 84 · LB 85 · DB 83
26	Missouri State	83.8	82.0	85.130	HS 40%Portal 60%	83.3	84.4	6%	QB 83 · Skill 84 · OL 83 · DL 85 · LB 82 · DB 85
27	Louisiana Tech	83.8	83.4	84.222	HS 48%Portal 52%	83.7	83.9	5%	QB 84 · Skill 85 · OL 83 · DL 84 · LB 84 · DB 83
28	Louisiana	83.8	83.8	—	HS only	83.5	84.0	2%	QB 82 · Skill 84 · OL 83 · DL 85 · LB 85 · DB 83
29	Miami (OH)	83.8	83.8	—	HS only	83.6	83.9	12%	QB 86 · Skill 84 · OL 82 · DL 84 · LB 82 · DB 85
30	Middle Tennessee	83.7	82.9	84.230	HS 38%Portal 62%	84.4	83.0	9%	QB 87 · Skill 86 · OL 83 · DL 84 · LB 82 · DB 83
31	Akron	83.7	83.2	84.027	HS 39%Portal 61%	82.9	84.6	11%	QB 83 · Skill 84 · OL 82 · DL 86 · LB 83 · DB 85
32	Arkansas State	83.6	83.5	83.728	HS 34%Portal 66%	84.2	83.1	5%	QB 89 · Skill 84 · OL 83 · DL 83 · LB 84 · DB 83
33	Boise State	83.6	84.0	82.916	HS 66%Portal 34%	84.4	82.8	5%	QB 84 · Skill 85 · OL 84 · DL 84 · LB 80 · DB 83
34	Eastern Michigan	83.6	83.7	83.417	HS 58%Portal 42%	83.6	83.6	2%	QB 85 · Skill 84 · OL 83 · DL 83 · LB 81 · DB 85
35	Western Kentucky	83.5	83.6	83.428	HS 32%Portal 68%	83.5	83.4	2%	QB 84 · Skill 85 · OL 82 · DL 83 · LB 85 · DB 83
36	Troy	83.4	83.4	—	HS only	83.6	83.3	7%	QB 82 · Skill 84 · OL 84 · DL 84 · LB 83 · DB 83
37	Utah State	83.4	83.9	83.338	HS 16%Portal 84%	83.3	83.5	6%	QB 85 · Skill 83 · OL 84 · DL 83 · LB 84 · DB 84
38	UTEP	83.4	82.9	83.632	HS 28%Portal 72%	84.1	82.7	4%	QB 86 · Skill 86 · OL 82 · DL 83 · LB 81 · DB 83
39	Hawaiʻi	83.4	81.7	84.626	HS 44%Portal 56%	83.3	83.5	5%	QB 86 · Skill 84 · OL 81 · DL 83 · LB 87 · DB 83
40	Southern Miss	83.3	83.6	83.228	HS 36%Portal 64%	82.1	84.6	7%	QB 83 · Skill 82 · OL 82 · DL 83 · LB 83 · DB 87
41	James Madison	83.3	83.3	83.329	HS 25%Portal 75%	83.9	82.7	5%	QB 83 · Skill 85 · OL 83 · DL 82 · LB 81 · DB 83
42	UAB	83.3	84.0	83.028	HS 31%Portal 69%	84.5	82.1	5%	QB 84 · Skill 85 · OL 85 · DL 82 · LB 83 · DB 82
43	Buffalo	83.3	83.3	83.320	HS 51%Portal 49%	83.1	83.4	0%	QB 83 · Skill 83 · OL 83 · DL 82 · LB 84 · DB 84
44	Charlotte	83.3	82.7	83.724	HS 45%Portal 55%	83.5	83.1	2%	QB 83 · Skill 83 · OL 84 · DL 84 · LB 81 · DB 84
45	Ball State	83.2	81.8	84.126	HS 40%Portal 60%	82.9	83.4	5%	QB 84 · Skill 83 · OL 82 · DL 86 · LB 83 · DB 82
46	Massachusetts	83.1	80.9	83.535	HS 14%Portal 86%	82.8	83.5	7%	QB 86 · Skill 83 · OL 82 · DL 85 · LB 84 · DB 82
47	San José State	83.1	82.8	83.718	HS 61%Portal 39%	83.9	82.4	2%	QB 84 · Skill 85 · OL 82 · DL 83 · LB 83 · DB 82
48	Rice	83.0	82.2	84.218	HS 59%Portal 41%	83.1	82.9	2%	QB 89 · Skill 83 · OL 82 · DL 82 · LB 83 · DB 83
49	Delaware	83.0	82.3	84.616	HS 68%Portal 32%	83.1	82.9	0%	QB 83 · Skill 83 · OL 83 · DL 83 · LB 82 · DB 83
50	UL Monroe	82.9	82.8	83.121	HS 52%Portal 48%	83.3	82.6	2%	QB 84 · Skill 85 · OL 82 · DL 82 · LB 82 · DB 83
51	Kennesaw State	82.9	81.7	83.529	HS 33%Portal 67%	83.0	82.8	7%	QB 89 · Skill 82 · OL 83 · DL 82 · LB 82 · DB 84
52	Old Dominion	82.9	82.3	83.819	HS 59%Portal 41%	83.6	82.2	3%	QB 82 · Skill 85 · OL 82 · DL 83 · LB 82 · DB 82
53	South Alabama	82.9	83.2	82.620	HS 47%Portal 53%	82.9	82.9	0%	QB 84 · Skill 83 · OL 83 · DL 84 · LB 78 · DB 83
54	Ohio	82.9	82.5	83.226	HS 45%Portal 55%	83.2	82.5	0%	QB 82 · Skill 84 · OL 82 · DL 83 · LB 82 · DB 82
55	Western Michigan	82.8	82.4	83.030	HS 31%Portal 69%	83.9	81.7	5%	QB 86 · Skill 84 · OL 84 · DL 81 · LB 83 · DB 82
56	Bowling Green	82.7	82.0	83.616	HS 60%Portal 40%	82.2	83.2	4%	QB 86 · Skill 83 · OL 80 · DL 85 · LB 83 · DB 82
57	New Mexico	82.6	83.4	81.517	HS 58%Portal 42%	83.2	82.0	2%	QB 84 · Skill 85 · OL 81 · DL 82 · LB 83 · DB 82
58	Toledo	82.6	82.5	82.638	HS 14%Portal 86%	82.4	82.7	0%	QB 81 · Skill 82 · OL 84 · DL 83 · LB 84 · DB 82
59	Wyoming	82.6	82.5	82.718	HS 61%Portal 39%	82.9	82.3	0%	QB 83 · Skill 83 · OL 83 · DL 82 · LB 82 · DB 83
60	Kent State	82.6	82.2	83.021	HS 53%Portal 47%	82.4	82.7	2%	QB 83 · Skill 83 · OL 82 · DL 81 · LB 84 · DB 84
61	New Mexico State	82.5	81.2	83.030	HS 29%Portal 71%	82.3	82.6	2%	QB 81 · Skill 83 · OL 82 · DL 83 · LB 82 · DB 82
62	Nevada	82.4	83.0	82.026	HS 38%Portal 62%	82.6	82.2	2%	QB 86 · Skill 83 · OL 82 · DL 82 · LB 83 · DB 82
63	Central Michigan	82.2	82.1	82.321	HS 47%Portal 53%	82.2	82.3	0%	QB 82 · Skill 81 · OL 83 · DL 81 · LB 82 · DB 84
64	Navy	82.2	82.2	—	HS only	82.8	81.6	2%	QB 83 · Skill 82 · OL 83 · DL 81 · LB 82 · DB 81
65	Northern Illinois	81.8	81.6	82.017	HS 64%Portal 36%	81.7	81.9	0%	QB 82 · Skill 82 · OL 82 · DL 82 · LB 83 · DB 81
66	Army	81.7	81.7	82.01	HS 97%Portal 3%	81.5	81.9	0%	QB 82 · Skill 81 · OL 81 · DL 81 · LB 82 · DB 82
67	Air Force	81.3	81.2	—	HS only	81.4	81.1	0%	QB 82 · Skill 82 · OL 81 · DL 79 · LB 82 · DB 81