Skip to board

Two-deep composite

Roster talent

Who is on the roster now — high-school signees plus portal transfers. HS and portal are separate two-deep ratings and a weight mix, not additive slices of the composite. Starters carry full weight, backups 0.4. Size is a separate board — not talent and not HX.

High school vs portal

Separate weighted 247 ratings on the listed two-deep — HS signees vs portal transfers — plus portal weight share. Sourced from roster players (transfer flag) and TWO·DEEP depth weights.

Top HS two-deep
Georgia
95.3
Top portal two-deep
Georgia
90.6
10 transfers
Heaviest portal mix
Ole Miss
75%
portal weight on two-deep

How the composite is built

  • The two-deep

    Listed TWO·DEEP charts from thetwodeep.com for all 136 FBS programs (2026-09-07). 247 composite, transfers included.

  • Transfers count

    A portal player is talent on this roster, not a hole in last year’s class.

  • OL is not this board

    Line size is a measurable, not an HX term. Open Size for mass. Units below are slices, not the ranking.

1
Georgia

94.3 composite

HS two-deep
95.3
Portal two-deep
90.6
10 transfers
HS weight 79%Portal weight 21%
4
Alabama

92.4 composite

HS two-deep
94.4
Portal two-deep
88.3
16 transfers
HS weight 67%Portal weight 33%
5
Texas

92.3 composite

HS two-deep
94.6
Portal two-deep
88.2
17 transfers
HS weight 64%Portal weight 36%

Compare two rosters

Team A
Team B

HS vs portal slices

94.6
HS two-deep
95.3
91.0
Portal two-deep
90.6
31%
Portal weight
21%
93.5
Talent composite
94.3
94.1
Starter talent
94.2
93.8
Offense
93.3
93.2
Defense
95.3
80%
Blue-chip %
84%

Unit slices — not the ranking

99.7
QB
95.0
94.0
Skill
93.5
92.3
OL
92.8
95.9
DL
95.8
89.1
LB
98.9
92.8
DB
93.5

Top of the composite

Weighted 247 of the listed two-deep, transfers included. HS and portal are subset ratings — not additive slices.

Ranking by Composite. Offensive line lives on Size — measurables, not this sort.

1Georgia
94.3
Composite 94.3
HS two-deep
95.3
Portal two-deep
90.6
10 transfers
HS weight 79%Portal weight 21%
2Alabama
92.4
Composite 92.4
HS two-deep
94.4
Portal two-deep
88.3
16 transfers
HS weight 67%Portal weight 33%
3Texas
92.3
Composite 92.3
HS two-deep
94.6
Portal two-deep
88.2
17 transfers
HS weight 64%Portal weight 36%
4Texas A&M
91.7
Composite 91.7
HS two-deep
92.5
Portal two-deep
90.5
17 transfers
HS weight 56%Portal weight 44%
5LSU
91.6
Composite 91.6
HS two-deep
93.6
Portal two-deep
90.3
27 transfers
HS weight 38%Portal weight 62%
6Florida
90.7
Composite 90.7
HS two-deep
92.3
Portal two-deep
88.2
19 transfers
HS weight 61%Portal weight 39%
7Tennessee
90.7
Composite 90.7
HS two-deep
92.8
Portal two-deep
86.8
14 transfers
HS weight 64%Portal weight 36%
8Oklahoma
90.0
Composite 90.0
HS two-deep
92.0
Portal two-deep
85.7
14 transfers
HS weight 67%Portal weight 33%
9Ole Miss
89.9
Composite 89.9
HS two-deep
92.3
Portal two-deep
89.1
31 transfers
HS weight 25%Portal weight 75%
10Kentucky
89.4
Composite 89.4
HS two-deep
88.3
Portal two-deep
90.0
26 transfers
HS weight 39%Portal weight 61%
11Missouri
88.4
Composite 88.4
HS two-deep
89.3
Portal two-deep
87.4
19 transfers
HS weight 54%Portal weight 46%
12South Carolina
88.4
Composite 88.4
HS two-deep
90.7
Portal two-deep
86.2
22 transfers
HS weight 50%Portal weight 50%
13Auburn
88.4
Composite 88.4
HS two-deep
90.5
Portal two-deep
87.2
24 transfers
HS weight 36%Portal weight 64%
14Mississippi State
88.2
Composite 88.2
HS two-deep
88.6
Portal two-deep
88.0
28 transfers
HS weight 32%Portal weight 68%
15Arkansas
87.1
Composite 87.1
HS two-deep
87.6
Portal two-deep
86.8
31 transfers
HS weight 29%Portal weight 71%
16Vanderbilt
87.0
Composite 87.0
HS two-deep
87.0
Portal two-deep
87.0
20 transfers
HS weight 53%Portal weight 47%